The Amorphous Branch of Government
The United States Constitution identifies three separate branches of government: Article I, establishes the Legislative Branch, Article II, establishes the Executive Branch, and finally Article III establishes the Judicial Branch. The Constitution sets forth the guidelines for each branch, in terms of what they can, and can't do. The Founding Fathers, in their wisdom wrote the Constitution in this manner to provide a system of checks and balances to insure that no one branch could dominate either of the other two. This was the intent of the Founding Fathers.
Given the aforementioned, there are problems that have evolved over the years as our country grew. The Founding Fathers could not have had the foresight or anticipated the evolution that is counter to the Founders intent. There is a fourth pseudo-branch of government that is known as the amorphous branch. This is the enormous “administrative branch” which oversees and implements the administration's policies. It is a massive bureaucracy that consists of a workforce of over 2 million employees and administers a budget of billions of dollars a year. This branch enforces rules that regulate energy, the environment, business, labor, employment, transportation, housing, agriculture, food, drugs, education, etc. You may well feel the effects, and control of this "amorphous" branch of government on a daily basis, it is slowly but surely abrogating the individual’s rights, and freedoms guaranteed by the United States Constitution, and our Bill of Rights.
As the bureaucracies continue to grow, so do the powers of the Federal Government. As you probably have figured out many of these Government entities are now headed by Czars. Sadly, if the trend does not stop, our Congress as well as the Constitution may become irrelevant, hence a Tyrant rules.
My God Bless America!
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Sunday, August 23, 2009
HB3200, Unconstitutional?
The liberal Democrats in Washington have lost their minds, and with any kind of voter response next year they will have lost their cushy Washington jobs. I for one have read most of HB3200, and believe me the legalese vernacular is not easy to read, however, the layman with a little effort, and patience can garner the important points of the Bill. It is however purposely vague and open to a wide spectrum of interpretation, and lawyers love it that way, as it does provide a lot of wiggle room when push comes to shove. Having said that, it is clear to me as well as millions of other Americans HB3200 is not really about health care reform is it? What it is about is a huge power grab, which will allow the Federal Government to control virtually every facet of your lives.
Not only is this HB3200 “America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009” a huge power grab that puts the American people on critical path to Socialism, I believe it is a Bill written that is unconstitutional. Now, I am not a Constitutional Scholar however, I can read, comprehend, evaluate, and come to rationale conclusions on nearly any subject written in English, the exceptions would be those subjects that are esoteric in nature.
I have read the Declaration of Independence many times, and I consider it the greatest document ever written in terms of what Thomas Jefferson envisioned the Essence of the United States of America should be and ultimately became. The U.S Constitution of course is in effect a “User’s Guide” on what the federal Government can do, and cannot do. The Bill of Rights particularly the first ten Amendments explicitly are for the protection from an intrusive, and oppressive government. Herein lies the problem with HB3200 it is over the top intrusive and oppressive mainly it takes away our freedom of choice by government mandated Universal Health care, we as citizens will have no choice. President Obama’s blathering on about “If you like your doctor and your health plan you can keep them” is just a crock. Private insurance companies will not be able to compete
against a Government run health plan that does not have to make a profit. Eventually everyone would be funneled into this onerous, people controlling behemoth of a bureaucracy.
Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution spells out the enumerated powers granted the Federal Government. So help me I see nothing in the enumerated powers that allows the Federal Government to mandate Universal health care for every American. As all Congressmen should know, any of those enumerated powers that are not authorized under Article I Section 8, are however, covered in the X Amendment.
Congressmen/women need to get off their political high horses and start living up to their Oath of Office, Read the Declaration of Independence, get familiar with the United States Constitution. You’re putting your political careers in jeopardy by following this nefarious progressive, statist path to the destruction of the United States. I do believe that in the words of the Japanese Admiral Yamamoto subsequent to the attack on Pearl Harbor, “I fear we have awakened a sleeping giant”, and folks this Universal Health Care is the progressive, statists Pearl Harbor.
May God Bless America, and all who love her!
Not only is this HB3200 “America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009” a huge power grab that puts the American people on critical path to Socialism, I believe it is a Bill written that is unconstitutional. Now, I am not a Constitutional Scholar however, I can read, comprehend, evaluate, and come to rationale conclusions on nearly any subject written in English, the exceptions would be those subjects that are esoteric in nature.
I have read the Declaration of Independence many times, and I consider it the greatest document ever written in terms of what Thomas Jefferson envisioned the Essence of the United States of America should be and ultimately became. The U.S Constitution of course is in effect a “User’s Guide” on what the federal Government can do, and cannot do. The Bill of Rights particularly the first ten Amendments explicitly are for the protection from an intrusive, and oppressive government. Herein lies the problem with HB3200 it is over the top intrusive and oppressive mainly it takes away our freedom of choice by government mandated Universal Health care, we as citizens will have no choice. President Obama’s blathering on about “If you like your doctor and your health plan you can keep them” is just a crock. Private insurance companies will not be able to compete
against a Government run health plan that does not have to make a profit. Eventually everyone would be funneled into this onerous, people controlling behemoth of a bureaucracy.
Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution spells out the enumerated powers granted the Federal Government. So help me I see nothing in the enumerated powers that allows the Federal Government to mandate Universal health care for every American. As all Congressmen should know, any of those enumerated powers that are not authorized under Article I Section 8, are however, covered in the X Amendment.
Congressmen/women need to get off their political high horses and start living up to their Oath of Office, Read the Declaration of Independence, get familiar with the United States Constitution. You’re putting your political careers in jeopardy by following this nefarious progressive, statist path to the destruction of the United States. I do believe that in the words of the Japanese Admiral Yamamoto subsequent to the attack on Pearl Harbor, “I fear we have awakened a sleeping giant”, and folks this Universal Health Care is the progressive, statists Pearl Harbor.
May God Bless America, and all who love her!
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
The Case for Self-Preservation vs HB3200
To establish a premise for "The Case for Self-Preservation", I need to quote the very first sentence of the Declaration of Independence (authored by Thomas Jefferson); "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." This quote could not have been more clearly articulated. It is on this premise that I will make the case against HB3200, "America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009". The insidious 1018 pages of this bill are in absolute, and total contradiction with first sentence of the Declaration of Independence.
HB3200 is riddled with a myriad of intrusive and oppressive set of rules that will deny the American people of their right to choose the insurance of their choice, if they choose any at all. The Government has no Constitutional right to mandate a National Health plan that forces every American to be covered. Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution lists the Enumerated Powers, there are 19 of them. The Enumerated Powers spell out what the Federal Government is authorized to do. You will not find any mention of mandated National Health Care. HB3200 clearly is in violation of the Enumerated Powers, therefore not Constitutionally legal.
Many provisions of HB3200 if enacted is the equivalent of a Death Warrant for millions of Senior Citizens, as well as millions of unborn children. If you are elderly and a high maintenance patient in terms of medical procedures and/or pharmaceuticals you will be denied procedures as well as the prescriptions you may require to continue your life with some acceptable measure in terms of your quality of your life.
If HB3200 is enacted at this point in time I will be looking for methods of self-preservation. To put it succinctly, when you are faced with a threat to your life which certain provisions of this onerous piece of legislation will certainly do, what do you do? When your life is threatened the innate psyche of the human mind of self-preservation takes over, you recognize the threat, assume a defensive posture and act to mitigate the threat by what ever means available and appropriate. The essence of this bit of verbiage is, HB3200 and the Federal Government are a threat to the lives of millions of people, the elderly and the unborn................Prepare to defend yourselves! It is perfectly clear that not one thing in HB3200 enhances your "Unalieable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" does it?
HB3200 is riddled with a myriad of intrusive and oppressive set of rules that will deny the American people of their right to choose the insurance of their choice, if they choose any at all. The Government has no Constitutional right to mandate a National Health plan that forces every American to be covered. Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution lists the Enumerated Powers, there are 19 of them. The Enumerated Powers spell out what the Federal Government is authorized to do. You will not find any mention of mandated National Health Care. HB3200 clearly is in violation of the Enumerated Powers, therefore not Constitutionally legal.
Many provisions of HB3200 if enacted is the equivalent of a Death Warrant for millions of Senior Citizens, as well as millions of unborn children. If you are elderly and a high maintenance patient in terms of medical procedures and/or pharmaceuticals you will be denied procedures as well as the prescriptions you may require to continue your life with some acceptable measure in terms of your quality of your life.
If HB3200 is enacted at this point in time I will be looking for methods of self-preservation. To put it succinctly, when you are faced with a threat to your life which certain provisions of this onerous piece of legislation will certainly do, what do you do? When your life is threatened the innate psyche of the human mind of self-preservation takes over, you recognize the threat, assume a defensive posture and act to mitigate the threat by what ever means available and appropriate. The essence of this bit of verbiage is, HB3200 and the Federal Government are a threat to the lives of millions of people, the elderly and the unborn................Prepare to defend yourselves! It is perfectly clear that not one thing in HB3200 enhances your "Unalieable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" does it?
Sunday, August 2, 2009
Mr. Obama, Show Us A Valid Birth Certificate!
When are the authorities going to push this pseudo-President to produce his vaulted Birth Certificate?
Phillip J. Berg a former Deputy Attorney General for the State of Pennsylvania, claims to have evidence that Barack Hussein Obama's birth was witnessed by his Paternal Grandmother, affirming that she was in the delivery room when he was born on August 4th, 1961, in Mombosa, Kenya.
The issue of Obama's birth place, which he states is Honolulu, Hawaii in 1961, has been raised enough times that his Campaign had posted an image purporting to be his "Certificate of Live Birth" from Hawaii. Mr. Berg as well as some skeptics assert the document is forged. They point out that the Document is computer generated, and that the technology was not available at in 1961.
Mr. Berg has cited Rule 36 of The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which states that unless the accused party provides written answers or objections to charges within 30 days, the accused legally admits the matter. Ref: http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule36.htm .
I, as well as millions of Americans demand to see his vaulted Birth Certificate that can without equivocation prove where he was born, with the date and time as well as the attending physician's name.
Mr. Obama -Produce the document, and answer the question, Are you a natural Born citizen? Your silence speaks volumes, and tells me that you are not.
Reference: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=78931
Phillip J. Berg a former Deputy Attorney General for the State of Pennsylvania, claims to have evidence that Barack Hussein Obama's birth was witnessed by his Paternal Grandmother, affirming that she was in the delivery room when he was born on August 4th, 1961, in Mombosa, Kenya.
The issue of Obama's birth place, which he states is Honolulu, Hawaii in 1961, has been raised enough times that his Campaign had posted an image purporting to be his "Certificate of Live Birth" from Hawaii. Mr. Berg as well as some skeptics assert the document is forged. They point out that the Document is computer generated, and that the technology was not available at in 1961.
Mr. Berg has cited Rule 36 of The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which states that unless the accused party provides written answers or objections to charges within 30 days, the accused legally admits the matter. Ref: http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule36.htm .
I, as well as millions of Americans demand to see his vaulted Birth Certificate that can without equivocation prove where he was born, with the date and time as well as the attending physician's name.
Mr. Obama -Produce the document, and answer the question, Are you a natural Born citizen? Your silence speaks volumes, and tells me that you are not.
Reference: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=78931
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)